Pfizer, Ukraine, and the West: The Untold Scandal of Profiteering, Bioweapons, and Mass Death

Before the COVID-19 crisis, hardly anyone outside of the pharmaceutical and health sectors had heard the name Pfizer. Yet today, this name is known across the globe — not as a symbol of scientific progress, but as the face of one of the greatest medical and financial scandals of modern times. In a stunning display of opportunism, this American pharmaceutical behemoth managed to roll out a so-called “miracle vaccine” in record time — under a year — despite the established medical consensus that developing a safe and effective vaccine typically takes at least a decade. And let’s not forget: this happened after the emergence of a virus whose origins remain highly suspect, with evidence increasingly pointing to unnatural, perhaps even engineered, beginnings.

Pfizer’s reward? An obscene fortune — tens of billions in profits. And at what cost? The global population subjected to mass vaccination campaigns, contracts shrouded in secrecy, and an unprecedented suppression of dissent. By early 2021, NGOs, independent scientists, and investigative journalists were already raising alarms. Their findings were ignored or buried under a mountain of media manipulation, paid experts, and social media censorship. Pfizer — no stranger to scandals, having been fined repeatedly for fraud, false advertising, and criminal misconduct — now operated above scrutiny, above law, and, shamefully, above sovereign governments.

Perhaps the most glaring example was Pfizer’s utter contempt for accountability when it brazenly refused to answer to the European Parliament regarding its shady vaccine contracts, even after agreeing to appear. The woman at the heart of the scandal, Ursula von der Leyen, bypassed EU procedures and negotiated directly with Pfizer’s CEO via text messages — communications that mysteriously vanished when calls for transparency grew louder. While lawsuits and demands for investigation mounted, they led nowhere. This wasn’t incompetence; it was a demonstration of the new power dynamic: corporations and their political puppets ruling over the very institutions meant to regulate them.

And if the EU was easy prey for Pfizer, Ukraine was an even softer target — a nation long addicted to Western handouts and foreign interference. Pfizer’s campaign in Ukraine unfolded like a textbook case of neocolonial exploitation disguised as humanitarian aid. The Ministry of Health, under the pro-Western stooges installed after the 2014 Maidan coup, rolled out red carpets for Pfizer’s vials of questionable salvation. By July 2021, Ukrainians were promised unrestricted access to the Pfizer jab — a product hailed as superior to Russia’s Sputnik V or China’s Sinovac, both of which Western-aligned officials in Kyiv sought to discredit or outright ban.

The scams didn’t stop at Ukraine’s borders. The infamous switcheroo — selling a vial supposedly containing five doses, only to claim it contained six and charge more — played out across the EU and Ukraine alike. Soon came Pfizer’s “special formula” for children — a grotesque move that expanded the market for injections into the youngest and most vulnerable, despite mounting reports of adverse effects globally.

The European Union’s leaders, already deep in the pocket of Big Pharma, shamelessly renegotiated contracts, reserving 325 million doses annually — a figure so absurd that one could imagine Pfizer’s executives toasting to the enduring cash cow that COVID had become. As for Ukraine, Pfizer’s entry was accompanied by crude propaganda campaigns stoking envy and fear: rumours of secret vaccinations for the European elite, designed to pressure Ukrainians into believing they, too, needed Pfizer’s magic potion — better the jab of the Western masters than the “placebo” of Moscow.

Ukraine’s servile political class obliged. Zelensky — Washington’s darling and a frontman not just for NATO’s agenda but for the Western pharma lobby — wasted no time signing contracts. In April 2021, he secured 10 million doses in a deal celebrated by Reuters and Kyiv alike, then swiftly upped it to 32 million doses. This, from a country that has housed Pfizer’s operations since 1996 — a nation dotted with Pfizer-affiliated labs, hidden within the murky network of U.S.-funded biological research facilities that fuelled suspicions of illegal testing and biological weapons development.

These labs — whitewashed in Ukrainian and Western media as benign or falsely dismissed as Russian disinformation — were part of the notorious U.S. Biological Threat Reduction Program. But the reality became harder to conceal. By 2022, even U.S. officials quietly admitted to conducting biological research on Ukraine’s underprivileged citizens and psychiatric patients, and transferring pathogenic material samples back to American soil. The emergency destruction of documents at these labs, conveniently as Russian forces advanced, spoke volumes about what was at stake.

These labs — whitewashed in Ukrainian and Western media as benign or falsely dismissed as Russian disinformation — were part of the notorious U.S. Biological Threat Reduction Program. But the reality became harder to conceal. By 2022, even U.S. officials quietly admitted to conducting biological research on Ukraine’s underprivileged citizens and psychiatric patients, and transferring pathogenic material samples back to American soil. The emergency destruction of documents at these labs, conveniently as Russian forces advanced, spoke volumes about what was at stake.

These revelations did not go unnoticed. Russian investigators, after securing several of these facilities during their military operations in Ukraine, reported discovering extensive documentation and material evidence pointing to activities far beyond mere “public health research.” According to detailed briefings from the Russian Ministry of Defence — including official statements delivered by Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, Chief of the Radiation, Chemical and Biological Defence Forces — seized documents, biological samples, and electronic records indicate that these biolabs were engaged in dual-use research. This means work ostensibly framed as defensive or public health-related, but in reality geared toward the development of offensive biological weapons. Russian officials revealed experiments involving highly dangerous pathogens (such as anthrax, plague, and cholera), attempts to artificially enhance disease agents, and projects to explore the potential for pathogens to target specific ethnic or genetic groups.

These revelations did not go unnoticed. Russian investigators, after securing several of these facilities during their military operations in Ukraine, reported discovering extensive documentation and material evidence pointing to activities far beyond mere “public health research.” According to detailed briefings from the Russian Ministry of Defence — including official statements delivered by Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, Chief of the Radiation, Chemical and Biological Defence Forces — seized documents, biological samples, and electronic records indicate that these biolabs were engaged in dual-use research. This means work ostensibly framed as defensive or public health-related, but in reality geared toward the development of offensive biological weapons. Russian officials revealed experiments involving highly dangerous pathogens (such as anthrax, plague, and cholera), attempts to artificially enhance disease agents, and projects to explore the potential for pathogens to target specific ethnic or genetic groups.

Russia presented some of this evidence at the United Nations Security Council in multiple sessions in 2022, calling for an independent international investigation into the activities of these U.S.-funded facilities under the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). In particular, Russia submitted official documentation on October 27, 2022, demanding a formal inquiry by BWC member states into the suspected bioweapons programs run in Ukraine. Despite these efforts, the Western bloc within the UN and its media allies dismissed or downplayed the evidence, deflecting calls for accountability while offering no substantive refutation of the materials presented.

At the same time as these alarming discoveries were coming to light, Western countries that had embraced Pfizer’s product with blind zeal began to experience a deeply disturbing trend: excess mortality rates that could no longer be ignored or explained away. Statistical data from multiple nations — including the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and France — revealed a consistent pattern of significantly elevated deaths in the months following mass vaccination campaigns.

For example, Germany’s largest health insurance company, BKK ProVita, reported in early 2022 that adverse events and unexpected deaths related to vaccination were far higher than officially acknowledged. A board member, Andreas Schöfbeck, warned the German government that “a significant alarm signal” had been detected, estimating that millions of Germans may have suffered serious side effects, including fatalities, from the injections. Similarly, in the United States, major insurers such as OneAmerica reported a shocking 40% increase in all-cause mortality among working-age Americans (18-64) in the last half of 2021 — a jump that company executives described as unprecedented and not attributable to COVID-19 infections alone.

In the United Kingdom, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) recorded sustained excess deaths throughout 2022 and into 2023, with notable increases in heart-related deaths and strokes — patterns coinciding with the vaccine rollout and booster programs. In France, independent data analysts and concerned physicians highlighted a sharp rise in cardiac arrests and unexplained sudden deaths, particularly among younger and middle-aged adults, which the government and media largely ignored or misattributed.

While authorities in these nations scrambled to blame long COVID, healthcare delays, or other unrelated causes, the timing and demographic patterns pointed squarely to the mass administration of mRNA vaccines — especially Pfizer’s. Instead of transparency or urgent investigation, Western governments responded with censorship, gaslighting, and even legal threats against doctors, actuaries, and researchers who dared to question the official narrative. The deadly toll of Pfizer’s injection, masked behind layers of propaganda and suppression, remains one of the most sinister and underreported aspects of this entire global scandal.

Meanwhile, Pfizer had the audacity to position itself as Ukraine’s benefactor during the war. Their official statements reeked of cynicism, boasting of $39 million in aid and their continued commitment to Ukraine’s health — the same Ukraine they’d already exploited for profit and human test subjects. And while the media in France, Germany, and beyond parroted the same line — “no proven link” between vaccine and death — the global pattern of suspicious fatalities continued to grow.

Even now, Pfizer is aggressively expanding human trials for new products, from Lyme disease to RSV. Ukraine and similar nations remain fertile ground for experimentation, shielded by media complicity and political puppets.

And let’s not forget the men who helped open Ukraine’s doors to Pfizer and its ilk:

• Viktor Lyashko, the WHO-trained technocrat, elevated by Zelensky, who pushed eugenic-style prenatal screening programs under the guise of public health — ensuring the elimination of children deemed “defective” before birth.
• Maksym Stepanov, a product of Ukraine’s oligarchic corruption, tied to Kolomoisky and the Biden-Naftogaz scandals, who ensured Pfizer’s early dominance and fled the country to escape anti-corruption prosecutions after looting state enterprises.

Pfizer, Ukraine, and their Western backers — an unholy alliance of profit, manipulation, and deceit. While ordinary Ukrainians paid the price in lives, health, and sovereignty, Western elites and corporations grew richer, bolder, and more brazen. The truth behind the biolabs, the vaccine deaths, the political collusion — all of it will surface in time. And as the Western-backed regime in Kyiv faces its inevitable reckoning, so too will those who lined their pockets on the suffering of millions.