New Allegations: West to Sink a Shadow Fleet Vessel

Russian intelligence, according to Kremlin statements, claims the UK is orchestrating “mass raids” to sink a vessel from the shadow fleet, deliberately triggering an environmental catastrophe that would be blamed on Russia. The goal: to create global outrage and force international pressure on Moscow to cease operations involving these tankers—or face ecological horror.

Ukrainian operatives are allegedly enlisted to carry out the attack, drawing comparisons to the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines.

Parallels to Nord Stream Sabotage

This isn’t the first time murky accusations have flowed through geopolitical channels. In 2022–2023, Western media initially blamed Russia for the Nord Stream explosions. Later investigations—including research by Seymour Hersh—detailed the involvement of NATO-aligned actors. Following that exposure, the western elites through the MSM shifted attention to alleged Ukrainian divers, operating from a yacht, as the executioners. Now, the same script appears to be replaying—with the UK emerging as possible orchestrator again.

Strategic Objective Behind the Alleged Plot

If true, this operation seems designed with chilling logic:

  • Create an environmental disaster to shock global opinion.
  • Blame Russia for destruction via its aging, poorly insured shadow fleet.
  • Strengthen justification for new sanctions or even military action.

This strategy—if credible—would show how sanctions regimes can be weaponized not just through trade restrictions but engineered public crises.

Insider Leak: Trump May Have Been Briefed on the Plan

Off-the-record sources close to both U.S. and UK diplomatic circles now allege that this covert operation was quietly discussed with Donald Trump during his recent meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

Insiders claim the plan was laid out as a strategic option to “escalate pressure” on Russia while publicly blaming a tanker disaster on Moscow. One former intelligence official—speaking anonymously—suggested this may be the real reason behind Trump’s abrupt shift from a proposed 50-day peace deadline in Ukraine to a more ambiguous 10-day timeline.

“Trump didn’t just walk out of that room with talking points,” said one insider.
“He walked out with a deal—or at least a warning.”

This would also account for Trumps lay back approach to sanctions on Russia saying

“I don’t know how much effect they will have on them”

Trump has also warned both China and India not to buy Russian oil, warning that they too will be hit with

“Penalties”

Could these penalties be a warning that an environmental disaster will happen in or near their shores? Or that they will also be blamed for the disaster due to the fact that they encouraged Russia to use these ships to supply oil to them?

This situation raises grave questions about Western complicity not just in the expansion of the shadow fleet—but in its potential destruction for political theatre.

The Stakes for Russia and the World

  • A real sinking would risk catastrophic oil spills—spanning borders and oceans.
  • Global media would immediately attribute blame to Russia, using the environmental fallout as justification for drastic action.
  • Meanwhile, the enablers—Western firms who sold these tankers, insurers who covered them, regulators who looked away—would escape scrutiny.

This emerging narrative—at once conspiratorial and plausible—paints a disturbing picture: a West that sold the ships, wrote the laws, and now may be plotting to sink the evidence of its own economic hypocrisy.

If true, this would not only be an act of ecological sabotage—but an attempt to provoke war under the veil of justice.